Long Ago Textbook History
Not So Long Ago

Infidel753 writes with an interesting observation about the ratification of the 19th Amendment to the US Constitution, the amendment formalizing and guaranteeing the right of women to vote.

Incredible, in a way, that this was only a century ago. So many things we take for granted now came surprisingly late in history.

I had written about conversations with my grandmother about her experiences as an adult in those days.

Those of my generation have been privileged, in our own way. We are the last to have actually met and spoken with eye witnesses to, participants in, and victims of, history that most of humanity can only know from history books and video documentaries. As a society, we live with slight transmutations of many of the same issues. Our collective imagination puts us farther from history than a real perspective would permit.

Our discussions often went past written history to daily life. My grandmother talked with me about the excitement in the schoolhouse in which she and her cousin taught after she managed to obtain the schedule of a local doctor. The two teachers lined their pupils at the front of the one-room building so they could all watch as he drove by, witnessing the first automobile they had ever seen. My grandparents explained road construction in those days, including regularly spaced dips in roads at steep hills, dips into which wagon wheels fit, allowing horses briefly to rest.

I do not believe I ever met anyone who experienced slavery in the old south. But I do know that former slaves from pre-Civil-War days were alive and telling their stories as I was growing up. The children of slaves had their own stories. An elderly woman told me there were two places she never wanted to go: Hell and Mississippi. An old man talked with me about the harshness of treatment that greeted a young black passenger of a train when he objected to segregated seating. The old man chuckled at the absurdity of challenging the awesome violent power of white supremacy.

And, of course, a rare living witness came to the nation in the mid-1950s. I may have seen the television program. I was too young to understand the significance until later. I’ve got a Secret was hosted each week by Garry Moore, who would introduce a series of guests to a celebrity panel. Members of the panel would each ask a few yes-or-no questions and try to guess the secret.

One guest in 1956 was 95 year old Samuel J. Seymour. The studio audience was stunned. As a youngster, he had been taken to Ford’s Theater, where he saw the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He watched, with the limited understanding of a child, as the great man was gunned down. He was still alive to talk on national television about the terrible moments as he witnessed them.

We are not that far removed from the glory and shame of our history, the role played by those who some of us have met, from whom we have learned.

My grandchildren may one day be called upon to explain the events they witnessed, including the evils perpetrated with the acquiescence of so many of today’s adults.

Perhaps it is not too late to improve the account they might give when asked what their grandfather did about the horrors of the times in which he lived.

The Indian Side

found online by Raymond

 

Shyamala Gopalan Harris – with a famous daughter

From Infidel753:

Much has been made of Kamala Harris’s status as the first black woman on a major-party presidential ticket, and this is indeed a historic milestone. But the other side of her background — the Indian side — deserves attention too.

Harris’s early exposure to Indian culture was substantial. As a child in California she attended both a Christian church and a Hindu temple (this in itself an encouraging sign that her parents were not dogmatic about religion), and also visited her mother’s family in Chennai in India several times. The name “Kamala” is of Indian origin. Even if she doesn’t strongly self-identify as Indian-American, she’s certainly far more familiar with India and its culture than most Americans are.

This matters because she has a strong chance of succeeding Biden as president.

– More –
 

The Perils Of Headline Journalism

found online by Raymond

 

Small Group of Vandals Sets Fire to Police Union Headquarters
From The Propaganda Professor:

A couple of news stories/ headlines from recent days (as of this writing) bring this problem home with blunt force. One is from The Oregonian, and covers the extensive protests in Portland. The headline reads:

Portland protest deemed ‘riot’ Saturday after fire set in police union building

The impression you get (and are almost certainly intended to get) from that is that protesters en masse wrought extensive havoc and destruction. But if you bother even to read as far as the first paragraph, you will see this:

A small group of demonstrators lit a fire inside the Portland police union building Saturday, sparking a riot declaration by police, who then advanced on the hundreds who gathered nearby.

Although labeling the troublemakers as “protesters”, which they probably weren’t, the reporter al least mentions that they were a (very) small group, and were separate from the actual protest — upon which nonetheless the police vented their anger. Yet that’s a very different picture from what is suggested by the headline above it.

This kind of journalistic or editorial ineptitude/ malfeasance leaves the American media wide open to tampering and manipulation. And it appears the Russians have taken note, planting phony or greatly exaggerated stories designed to stoke right-wing outrage.

– More –
 

19th Amendment to the US Constitution

Did not apply to all women

Ratified exactly 100 years ago today.

My grandmother and I talked about that day. She was teaching in Chemung County, New York, when the news came.

I asked her about her feelings when she heard about women’s right to vote being constitutionally guaranteed. She said it made her very happy, especially for a good friend who was a suffragette.

Seems like such a primitive time, and yet my life overlapped with that of a wonderful woman who lived it as an adult.

William Faulkner:

The past is never dead. It’s not even past.

Tweets Of The Day — Celebrities With A Conscience Edition

found online by Raymond

 

Taylor Swift Speaking from Conscience

From Hackwhackers:

It would be nice if more celebrities would step up, use their platforms and be more outspoken about what’s happening to their country rather than promoting their next gig or music drop. But we’ll settle for these four because of their reach (Taylor Swift – 87 million followers; John Legend – 13.6 million; Alyssa Milano 3.7 million; Reese Witherspoon 2.8 million)…

– More –
 

2020 to Be Measured in Dog Years

found online by Raymond

 

2020 – One Third Still to Go

From Ant Farmer’s Almanac:

“We aren’t yet certain how the additional time will be distributed,” says Dr. Gerald Bostock, Dean of the Institute’s History Department, “But it probably won’t be divvied up evenly as some months, weeks and even days have been more jam-packed than others.”

While the names or titles for these new parcels of time haven’t been finalized, Bostock acknowledges that “Head-Spinning”, “Hair-Raising”, “You’ve Got to be Kidding Me” and “WTF!!!” were all in serious consideration.

– More –
 

Will Party Conventions Matter This Year?

found online by Raymond

 

Things are different this year – but maybe not completely different

From Jonathan Bernstein:

In normal times, the events offer a free week of advertising for the parties and their candidates. Will the usual media norms apply during a pandemic?

Conventions for the past 50 years or so have served two big functions. As quadrennial meetings of party actors, they offer the same socializing and networking and identity-building opportunities that any large organization’s convention does. And they advertise the party and its presidential ticket. For the latter, the official podium program is only part of the effort. Media norms dictate in normal cycles that the broadcast networks relocate much of their news and even some of their other personnel to the convention’s host city and devote a week’s worth of coverage to the party. The cable news networks, too, usually make the conventions their dominant story for the week, as do all the online political sites.

This suggests that as long as both the partisan and the neutral political media still treat this year’s conventions as the real thing, they will actually function a lot like normal, even without having all the delegates as a backdrop.

Political advertising isn’t usually very successful at persuading voters to switch their support from one candidate to the other, and that’s not usually the main function of conventions. What conventions can do is trigger weak partisans — those who generally support the party but don’t pay a lot of attention to politics and don’t think of themselves as automatic party voters — by reminding them of their political orientation.

– More –
 

Undeniable Proof of Stupidity in Trump World

found online by Raymond

 

Make America Think Again [Photo by Jose M]

From Glenn R. Geist at MadMikesAmerica:

The narcissism of small differences. I like the title of Freud’s 1917 book though it didn’t at first seem to apply to the dispute I narrowly avoided in the FB page of the local newspaper yesterday. But brooding about the end of America last night I changed my mind. Perhaps when the differences become so small they’re not differences at all the arguments become the most fierce.

Of course the argument was about the so-small-it-doesn’t-matter differences between Absentee voting and vote-by-mail voting. Is there really any difference other than one asks for an excuse and the other does not, even though there is almost always a reason that has to do with health and ability? Is the voter out of town or is one just unable for fear of dying? That is the question and it’s a question I can’t see as having any importance to the honesty of an election despite the assurances of the deranged that we need to force people to swim through a lagoon of deadly virus to go to the polls to avoid a “disaster.”

It’s a small difference or ‘no consequence’ difference it seems to me. Not so to the local Trump cultists who screech like subway car wheels.

– More –
 

Most Don’t Like Trump, Including a THIRD of Trump’s Own Supporters

found online by Raymond

 

The Unliked President [Photo by Samantha Sophia]

From Tommy Christopher:

In a new Economist/YouGov poll, respondents were asked “Regardless of whether you agree with him, do you like or dislike Donald Trump as a person?”

Only 30 percent of Americans said they like Trump, with only 15 percent saying they like Trump “a lot.”

Fifty percent said they dislike Trump, including 37 percent who said they dislike him “a lot,” while another 15 percent said they “Neither like nor dislike” Trump.

But even among those who plan to vote for Trump in 2020, there was a big chunk of people who don’t like their own candidate.

– More –
 

The Purpose Is to Inject the Poison into the System

found online by Raymond

 

Revisionist Researcher John Eastman Presents Newest Controversial Birthright Theory

From PZ Myers:

The news has been full of this nonsense about how Kamala Harris may not be a US citizen, prompted by a terrible op-ed in Newsweek. It’s a shitty argument made with absurd confidence/arrogance by a guy installed in a sinecure in a right-wing think tank.

Eastman’s Newsweek article rehashes an argument he has made for years: that American-born children of immigrants only acquire birthright citizenship if their parents were lawful permanent residents at the time of birth. According to Eastman, the children of immigrants who entered the U.S. without authorization, or on a temporary permit, are not American citizens. Rather, they constitute an underclass of (mostly stateless) aliens subject to deportation and denied the rights and privileges of American citizenship. His article is titled “Some Questions for Kamala Harris About Eligibility”—he’s just asking questions!—because he believes her citizenship turns on the immigration status of her parents when she was born. If her parents were “temporary visitors, perhaps on student visas,” Eastman wrote, then Harris lacks American citizenship. Eastman has never fully explained how he intends to strip millions of Americans of their citizenship, though he does suggest that, at a minimum, Harris might need to be expelled from her Senate seat.

That’s garbage, but mission accomplished: the author has successfully made a ludicrous idea a topic of conversation, and it really doesn’t matter that most of the conversation is about how stupid and wrong it is, as long as everyone is talking about it. Like this post.

The real question is how the media willingly swallow this poison in the first place.

– More –