Trump Unbound!


 
Well. That was bracing!

As if we are witnessing a weekly detective drama, an hour of evasions and denials are shattered by an angry, climactic confession. I did it and I’m glad I did it!

It first took two days to go from this:

…hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides — on many sides.

to this:

…criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.

President Trump had gone from the sound of one hand clapping (on many sides) to a grudging admission that neo-Nazis and white supremacists, no matter what alt-right euphemisms they hid behind, were wrong and un-American. It should not have been an admission. Others had no hesitation at recognizing moral clarity.

But in his heart of hearts, it had to have burned. The deep resentment at being made to say something, anything, especially what he simply did not believe, became too much.

Such moments do come in fiction. As innocent victims are about to be found guilty, the defenders know they have only one slim hope.

The one who is guilty must somehow be provoked into a public confession:

And now you think you can get him to just say it?

I think he wants to say it. I think he’s pissed off that he’s gotta hide from this. I think he wants to say that he made a command decision and that’s the end of it.

– From A Few Good Men, 1992

And so the anger comes.

You can’t HANDLE the truth.

…then the confession

Did you order the Code Red?

You’re God damn right I did!

But in real life?

The seething anger, at turning from his core beliefs, at being forced to say what he clearly did not want to say: Such submission to lesser beings is for losers.

It took a single day of pent up rage to go from this:

…criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans

to this:

Yes. I do think there’s blame on both sides. You look at both sides. I think there’s blame on both sides and I have no doubt about it and you don’t have any doubt about it either…

He flailed for a legitimate reason to backtrack, to backtrack without admitting he was backtracking. Suddenly, a host of people marching alongside of white supremacists in a demonstration organized for the purpose of uniting white nationalists, were transformed into gentle people of good will, not racists at all.

I’ve condemned many different groups, but not all of those people were neo-Nazis, believe me. Not all of those people were white supremacists, by any stretch.

Not by any stretch.

So they marched alongside Nazis carrying torches and firearms. They shouted out slogans. But they were not racists. The chants were incidental. They simply wanted to maintain icons that were always meant to celebrate their historic heritage.

You’re changing history. You’re changing culture and you had people, and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists because they should be condemned, totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, OK? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly.

He parroted what I have heard for all of my adult life from organized apologists for Confederate principles. The celebration of that confederate heritage, a heritage of organized violence in defense of slavery, is simply a defense of history itself. If we do not celebrate those who took up arms to defend slavery, why do we not tear down acknowledgement of the original founders of our nation?

So, this week it’s Robert E. Lee. I noticed that Stonewall Jackson is coming down. I wonder is it George Washington next week and is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You know, you really do have to ask yourself where does it stop?

Yes, where does it stop?

We should indeed have honest discussions about what conservatives such as Condoleezza Rice have called America’s birth defect. I have some trouble with the fact that, as the fight for American liberty went on, over forty slaves managed to achieve their own freedom only by escaping the plantations of George Washington and Thomas Jefferson.

And yet…

The writings of those founders do reveal an edge of regret, a recognition that the evil in which they participated must soon end. From Thomas Jefferson, writing about slavery:

I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever…

The contradiction between ideals and practice is something we need to confront. It incites our collective conscience. It provokes, as it must, occasional restless nights.

And yet, our nation, for all its torments and failures, has advanced. The arc of the moral universe is way too long, but we pray Martin Luther King was right about the direction of that arc. For all their sins, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson wrote and signed and dedicated their sacred honor to what Lincoln later described as a proposition. They set us firmly in a direction.

They did not send their brethren to fight and die to keep fellow human beings in chains.

Many of the monuments in question today were constructed less to honor historical figures than to signify resistance to the idea of equality. Many were erected decades after the Civil War as the KKK arose and lynchings became commonplace. They were dedicated to that violence. More statues were added half a century later in opposition to civil rights.

The Charlottesville demonstrations to keep those monuments were expressly organized to promote racial solidarity among white nationalist groups, to join them together into what organizers hoped would become a unified national racist movement.

The Nazi salutes, the Nazi chants from the 1930s, the menacing display of firearms left little doubt about what was on display. If it quacks like a Nazi… Still, my President now insists that any number of those who joined in those demonstrations were not themselves racists.

President Trump has not been noted for the virtue of personal loyalty. He demands it but does not return it. The White House lawn is littered with the bodies of political loyalists. He is an employer jealous of attention and ready to turn on those he suspects of stealing that precious commodity.

Outside of his staff, his deepest wrath is reserved for outsiders, strangers, those who speak against him, those whose words sting, those whom he sees as his inferiors, the losers in life. How dare they!

But his more global loyalty toward those who fawn over him, those who say nice things about him, those who support him: that loyalty is rock solid. White nationalists are a sort of domestic Vladimir Putin. They are not to be targeted with more than the most even handed commentary. If Vladimir kills, well… the murders happen on many sides — “on many sides.”

The supporters of the President have his back.

I have the most loyal people. Did you ever see that? Where I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters, okay?

His base would stand with him, no matter whom he killed.

My President demonstrates to that base that he feels the same toward them.

I think he wants to say it. I think he’s pissed off that he’s gotta hide from this.

“And nobody wants to say that, but I’ll say it right now.

A wonderful young woman is dead and 19 more are wounded by an act of terrorism.

“I think there’s blame on both sides, and I have no doubt about it.”


Subscribe to the podcast via iTunes or RSS
to get episodes automatically downloaded.

 

Trump Confirms His Racism Hours After Fake White Supremacy Statement

found online by Raymond

 
From Tommy Christopher:

Donald Trump delivered a long-delayed and perfunctory denunciation of white supremacy at the White House on Monday afternoon, a performance that fooled almost no one (almost). But then, the point wasn’t ever to fool anyone in the first place.

Trump’s refusal to denounce Nazis and white supremacists on Saturday, followed by ostensible acts of cleanup by others in his administration, and his forced statement two days later, were all part of a performance art piece intended to do exactly what it did: signal to white supremacists that he’s really on their side and feed his other aggrieved white supporters’ sense that the media is out to get him.

– More –
 

The Fountainhead

found online by Raymond

 
From nojo Stinque:

We’ve always been drawn to satire. From Mad to SNL to Spy and beyond, satire has been the refreshment for our soul. We drink it in, savor it, remember it for decades.

Satire makes sense of the world. It brings order to chaos, the rational mastering the irrational. Satire gets at the truth, by revealing the lies. Like jazz, the genius of satire is in what remains unsaid.

We have practiced satire whenever possible. We wrote a satire column in college. We helped produce a tabloid with a satirical undertone. We launched a blog whose dominant theme is satire.

And yet we have produced little satire for a long time.

There was a moment, a year ago spring, where we felt the urge leave us. It was not that the dominant Republican candidate wasn’t ripe for satire — you would think it unavoidable, really — but that satire wasn’t up to the threat he presented. The truths that satire could reveal, the truths that make good satire fun to produce, were unneeded. Nothing was hidden, nothing needed teasing out, nothing needed highlighting. It was all there, for all to see. Satire could add nothing to the picture. It was the wrong tool.

Which really bothered us, because from Nixon on, whether as audience or producer, satire had gotten us through a lot. Through everything, really. And from Nixon on, there’s been a lot to get through. So why, now, when we would need satire to get us through the worst yet, has it failed us?

That question’s been on our mind for more than a year. The answer has been as well, but we’ve seen only glimpses. But we’re starting to get it now, and in a manner that really surprises us:

Satire is a luxury.

– More –
 

I’m Sure that Magical Truth Detector is Somewhere in my Lab.

found online by Raymond

 
From PZ Myers:

Last week, Mary Beard was getting sneered at because she agreed that the Roman Empire was ethnically diverse, and that — gasp, shock horror — there were brown people living in ancient Britain. She’s still getting sneered at, of course, because one thing racists really hate is being told their prejudices aren’t empirical facts. But at least the silly contretemps stirred up some excellent responses.

– More –
 

A Misplaced Focus on “Collusion”

found online by Raymond

 
From Julian Sanchez:

Public discussion of the FBI’s ongoing investigation into Russian influence on the 2016 election is dominated by the question of collusion: Were senior members of the Trump campaign knowing collaborators in the Russian government’s campaign to undermine Hillary Clinton’s candidacy? My own view is that we’re unlikely to get any truly conclusive evidence of this—but also that it’s a mistake to treat it as the only important question for an investigation to answer.

– More –
 

Terror By Car

found online by Raymond

 
From Green Eagle:

I am interested in the large number of commentators that are so quick to compare the right wing terrorist who drove his car into a group of peaceful protesters this weekend, to the several associates of ISIS who have done the same thing in the last couple of years. Nobody seems to have enough memory, however, to make the following obvious comment:

You know, just about anyone on earth can get their hands on a car or a truck, and drive it into a crowd. It’s not high tech terrorism.

– More –
 

Britain’s Trembling Stiff Upper Lip

found online by Raymond

 
From Neil Bamforth at MadMikesAmerica:

The British people have, or more accurately, had for many decades been best known for, if nothing else, their ‘stiff upper lip’. The saying ‘stiff upper lip’ referred to the British ability to remain stoic in adversity. WWII was, possibly, the time when the British stoical stiff upper lip was most to the fore.

The British stiff upper lip was admired across the globe. Sometimes in amazement at quite how much the British could tolerate whilst remaining polite and calm and sometimes in the belief that the British were clearly mad as hatters.

Both perceptions probably held a reasonable degree of truth but it mattered not ultimately.

The British would, at all times, regardless of trials and tragedies, regardless of pain and suffering and regardless of insults and grievous setbacks always remain in the face of all adversity calm and composed and behave like gentlemen. It was acknowledged that British women as well were more than capable of ‘the stiff upper lip’ in times of crisis.

‘The stiff upper lip’ was quintessential to being British.

Then came Princess Diana.

– More –
 

Thoughts on the Charlottesville Riot

found online by Raymond

 
From Infidel753:

Sometimes it’s hard to know where to start. Neo-Nazis instigating murderous violence is not, in itself, terribly surprising. It comes with the territory of the ideology with which they’ve chosen to associate themselves. People who aren’t violent probably don’t become neo-Nazis in the first place.

What immediately struck me about the attack that killed Heather Heyer and injured many others was that ramming a car into a crowd of people is an established jihadist tactic — they’ve used it several times in Britain and France, and nobody had any hesitation in labeling those incidents as terrorism. The driver in this case may even have gotten the idea from reading about those attacks in the news.

The circumstances fueling our neo-Nazi, Confederate-revivalist, and militant Christian Right movements also resemble those fueling jihadism. In both cases a culturally-conservative society (the USA outside its urban cores, the Middle East) has for decades seen a massive influx of liberal ideas eroding the dominance of a traditional monoculture, challenging that monoculture’s deepest taboos, and shifting the entire society towards cultural pluralism. In both cases, reactionaries angry and frightened at that loss of dominance are trying to re-assert it by embracing extremist ideology and militance against cultural change. The demand is, put everything back the way it was before — before blacks and women and gays started getting uppity, before anti-Semitism became unacceptable in polite society. Back when our belief system was dominant and no one dared question it.

Next, Trump and his “many, many sides” blithering.

– More –