Impeach, Christianity Today, 6 Pages, Why Not Bi, No Defense, Trump Boss

Christianity Today Headline

  • At The Onion, a prominent Christian magazine encounters controversy by suggesting that Trump does not belong in the Holy Trinity.
     
  • Okay, so that primary Christian magazine, Christianity Today, actually calls for the removal from office of President Trump. North Carolina pastor John Pavlovitz explains why Christianity Today is right.
     
  • John Scalzi at Whatever has a few thoughts about impeachment. Democrats have been out to get President Trump for a while. So John wonders why Republicans didn’t make it bi-partisan, since Trump is a lawless, heartless, crooked, incompetent President and a malignant human being. Picky, picky.
     
  • Jonathan Bernstein watches the impeachment debate and wonders why Republicans didn’t try harder to defend Trump.
     
  • Our favorite Earth-Bound Misfit finds what everyone wants to know about impeachment: What does Trump’s boss say?
     
  • Max’s Dad conducts a close analysis of the recent 6-page response by my President to Speaker Pelosi, and finds within it a compelling argument that Donald Trump is a mad hatter.
     
  • News Corpse thumbs through old news stories and finds another manifesto that resembles Trump’s 6-page diatribe.
     
  • Wisconsin conservative James Wigderson offers uncritical coverage of Republican criticism of Nancy Pelosi. Seems Pelosi is caught in a contradiction, since Democrats say removal of Trump can’t wait, but now she’s going to wait.
     
    Well, my president has been caught trying to fix the 2020 election with an elaborate smear by a foreign government, and still continues trying to fix the 2020 election with a smear by a foreign government, which kind of explains the can’t wait part.
     
    And McConnell says he’s got the fix in, and promises no real consideration of the charges. So Nancy will wait to submit the articles of impeachment until the Senate reveals how they will conduct an actual trial. As opposed to a sham dismissal.
     
    James doesn’t include any of that reasoning, though. An oversight, I imagine.