<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/2.4.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>FU    -     FairAndUNbalanced.com - Latest comments on Candidates, Debates, Fox, Go Clean Your Room</title>
		<link>http://fairandunbalanced.com/blog1.php?disp=comments</link>
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=2.4.1"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
				<item>
			<title>In response to: Candidates, Debates, Fox, Go Clean Your Room</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>T. Paine [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c35483@http://www.fairandunbalanced.com/</guid>
			<description>Pre-gloating, Mr. Deming?  Hmm&amp;#8230; okay.  My post was meant to be a measured analysis of the voting electorate.  The fact that the majority seems to be in line with my own political predilections I guess can be construed as gloating though.  As for the wayward pollsters, I don&amp;#8217;t hate them and wish to kill them accordingly.  I simply think that their methodologies are often inaccurate and wrong.  The only thing that this does, other than ruin their own credibility as reliable pollsters as you pointed out, is the fact that when Obama does lose in a land-slide, there are going to be myriads of liberals (more than three) that are going to accuse the GOP of rigging the vote because the polls didn&amp;#8217;t indicate accurately their impending demise in the voting booth.  I am not angry at the messenger.  Indeed I shake my head in wonder at their seemingly wishful thinking as supported by erroneous methodology.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pre-gloating, Mr. Deming?  Hmm&#8230; okay.  My post was meant to be a measured analysis of the voting electorate.  The fact that the majority seems to be in line with my own political predilections I guess can be construed as gloating though.  As for the wayward pollsters, I don&#8217;t hate them and wish to kill them accordingly.  I simply think that their methodologies are often inaccurate and wrong.  The only thing that this does, other than ruin their own credibility as reliable pollsters as you pointed out, is the fact that when Obama does lose in a land-slide, there are going to be myriads of liberals (more than three) that are going to accuse the GOP of rigging the vote because the polls didn&#8217;t indicate accurately their impending demise in the voting booth.  I am not angry at the messenger.  Indeed I shake my head in wonder at their seemingly wishful thinking as supported by erroneous methodology.]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://fairandunbalanced.com/blog1.php/2012/10/20/candidates-debates-fox-go-clean-your-roo#c35483</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
