Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)

Comment from: james wigderson [Visitor] · http://www.wigderson.com
Because she has issued an apology for the statement under oath, but has not retracted it. Meanwhile, the person she accused actually endorsed her candidacy, but denies she ever discriminated against the candidate.

Yeah, it's confusing, and that's why the candidate needs to say more than just "no."
02/17/13 @ 09:34

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« Introduction - All Who Pass This WayRomney/Obama Ads Show Us How to Save Health Care »