Trackback URL (right click and copy shortcut/link location)

Comment from: Jerry Critter [Visitor] · http://critterscrap.blogspot.com
LOL. Very good, Burr. The republicans are truly the Tonya Harding of politics.
01/23/13 @ 09:57
Comment from: T. Paine [Visitor] · http://savingcommonsense.blogspot.com
I would submit that the Democrats are the Anna Nicole Smith's of politics.

They have no talent and simply want to live off the riches of another, and are willing to whatever is necessary to do so. :)
01/23/13 @ 11:40
Comment from: Burr Deming [Member] Email
Thank you, T. Paine.

As a Democrat, I encourage my conservative brothers and sisters to adopt your views.

As an American, I do not believe Republicans are healthy in their outlook, not for themselves, not for the country, when they campaign against democracy itself.
01/23/13 @ 12:01
Comment from: Jerry Critter [Visitor] · http://critterscrap.blogspot.com
TP,
At least we have big tits.
01/24/13 @ 13:32
Comment from: T. Paine [Visitor] · http://savingcommonsense.blogspot.com
Jerry, I would perhaps phrase it slightly differently, sir.

Democrats are typically bigger boobs.
01/25/13 @ 12:31
Comment from: JMyste [Visitor]
Mr. Paine,

"I would submit that the Democrats are the Anna Nicole Smith's of politics.

They have no talent and simply want to live off the riches of another, and are willing to whatever is necessary to do so. :) "

The problem with this theory is that Obama is one of the rich you claim he targets. I also advocate a very progressive tax system, where I not only don't live off the rich, but pay more taxes. Additionally, I am completely against a flat tax or a federal sales tax, both of which would target the poor and probably end in a tax reduction for me.

Your notion that if someone advocates liberal policy, then they probably want the rich man's money, is flawed. As long as republicans have this ridiculous interpretation, no rational dialog can happen.
01/26/13 @ 12:11
Comment from: F&B [Visitor]
JMyste, I freely admit that not all liberals want the rich man's money, at least not for themselves. Of course this mainly applies to wealthier liberals.

Most poor liberals (really poor, not just poor by Obama's definition) do receive money from the government that is primarily (80%) contributed by wealthier Americans. So the argument may be only slightly flawed - there is a minority of wealthy people among democrats.

Many (not all) of these vote for democrat candidates under the belief that democrats will give them more (of other peoples') money than republican candidates will.

Democrats need to admit this, but republicans are willing to have the dialog even if they don't. Something needs to be done. The country is suffering financially and taxing the wealthy more won't fix it.
01/27/13 @ 21:06
Comment from: Jerry Critter [Visitor] · http://critterscrap.blogspot.com
"...democrats will give them more (of other peoples') money than republican candidates will."

Very true. Democratic candidates support more social programs to assist citizens to achieve the American dream. Republican candidates support more programs that assist people who have already achieved the American dream.
01/28/13 @ 13:42

Leave a comment


Your email address will not be revealed on this site.

Your URL will be displayed.
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Name, email & website)
(Allow users to contact you through a message form (your email will not be revealed.)
« Secretary Clinton Should Have KnownConservative Conciliation Gets Fiery Reception »