Author: Raymond

 
From Max’s Dad:

Out of the closets and into the streets! 50 years ago the Stonewall “riots” occurred when the NYPD did what the NYPD did best at the time, acted like assholes and raided a bar called the Stonewall Inn. Some of the patrons of Stonewall had had enough and did what others had done in other parts of the country before, they fought back. It was about time.

The Stonewall Inn is generally regarded as the beginning of the gay rights movement because every rights movement has to have a starting point. Oh I know that other gays fought back before 6/28/69, and I know Rosa Parks wasnt the first black woman to refuse to give up her seat, and I know that there were other women before Susan B that fought back, but we need a start. Lets not get too deep into the woods here. Thats the problem with people too close to movement, they know too goddamned much and cant wait to let you know. Democrats take note.

– More –
 

 
From News Corpse:

Still Obsessed with Losing the Popular Vote, Trump Babbles Incoherently About Winning It

Trump’s raging ego and self-exaltation has been demonstrated time and time again in the two and half turbulent years that he has occupied the White House. He cannot admit mistakes even when the evidence is unarguably documented. He incessantly brags on his own behalf for “accomplishments” that don’t exist. Those include “resolutions” of problems that he created himself like a firefighter moonlighting as an arsonist. And he has repeatedly forced his subordinates to sit around a table and utter slobbering tributes to him in a perverse spectacle of supplication and sycophancy.

So it shouldn’t surprise anyone that Trump continues to be plagued by one particularly humiliating failure. His historic loss of the popular vote to Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election gnaws at him like a famished piranha. He can’t stop thinking about it, or lying about it. And that fetish reared its ugly head again in an interview with Chuck Todd on Meet the Press Sunday morning.

– More –
 

 
From Tommy Christopher:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Rips Ivanka Trump Over Viral Video of Awkward Conversation with World Leaders

On Saturday, a BBC reporter posted French government video of a candid moment between French President Emmanuel Macron, UK Prime Minister Theresa May, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and International Monetary Fund (IMF) chief Christine Lagarde that was presented as if Ms. Trump injected herself into the conversation.

Lagarde, in particular, appears irritated in the clip, although she also tweeted praise for Ivanka.

The clip went viral, and led to a tidal wave of internet mockery, which AOC joined in on Saturday night. Retweeting the viral clip, AOC wrote “It may be shocking to some, but being someone’s daughter actually isn’t a career qualification.”

“It hurts our diplomatic standing when the President phones it in & the world moves on,” she continued, adding “The US needs our President working the G20. Bringing a qualified diplomat couldn’t hurt either.”

– More –
 

 
From nojo:

We thought we understood fascism.

The American kind, anyway. The kind that almost consumed the country in the 1930s, as it had consumed others. The kind rooted in economic depression, in desperation, in opportunistic leadership. The kind rooted in fantasy, a quick fix to an unsolvable, unendurable crisis.

We thought we understood that.

We thought we understood that all problems are economic, when you cut through the bullshit. Healthy countries — economically healthy countries — don’t have these problems. We all get by, we all get along. We all have a roof over our heads.

We wuz wrong.

– More –
 

 
From author John Scalzi:

Yesterday I came across a recent fanzine with a rather emphatic editorial about (and against) me, and my influence on the Hugo Awards and on science fiction and fantasy fandom in general. I posted a link to it on Twitter, and the editorial — and I — became the subject of much comment online. I was busy most of the day yesterday with business meetings and (because I’m in LA) driving to business meetings, so I didn’t have much to say about it. But I have a bit of time this morning to talk about some of the topics it brings up, so let me touch on a few of them.

1. First and most obviously, the author of the piece is perfectly within the bounds to have the opinion she has, even if she’s being mean to me, and even if I think the thesis of her argument and the general procedure of it is largely incorrect. I can take it, and I will remind people never to be an asshole on my behalf to anyone else, please, and thank you.

– More –

 
From Julian Sanchez of the Cato Institute:

In testimony before the
Subcommittee on Intelligence and Counterterrorism
Committee on Homeland Security
United States House of Representatives

Algorithms may be able to determine that a post contains images of extremist content, but they are far less adept at reading contextual cues to determine whether the purpose of the post is to glorify violence, condemn it, or merely document it — something that may in certain cases even be ambiguous to a human observer. Journalists and human rights activists, for example, have complained that tech company crackdowns on violent extremist videos have inadvertently frustrated efforts to document human rights violations, and erased evidence of war crimes in Syria.

Just this month, a YouTube crackdown on white supremacist content resulted in the removal of a large number of historical videos posted by educational institutions, and by anti-racist activist groups dedicated to documenting and condemning hate speech.

Of course, such errors are often reversed by human reviewers — at least when the groups affected have enough know-how and public prestige to compel a reconsideration. Government mandates, however, alter the calculus. As three United Nations special rapporteurs wrote, objecting to a proposal in the European Union to require automated filtering, the threat of legal penalties were “likely to incentivize platforms to err on the side of caution and remove content that is legitimate or lawful.” If the failure to filter to the government’s satisfaction risks stiff fines, any cost-benefit analysis for platforms will favor significant overfiltering: Better to pull down ten benign posts than risk leaving up one that might expose them to penalties. For precisely this reason, the EU proposal has been roundly condemned by human rights activists and fiercely opposed by a wide array of civil society groups.

– More –
 

 
From Frances Langum:

At the Faith and Freedom Coalition conference, the so-called president said “We needed 60 votes & we had 51, & sometimes we had a hard time with a couple. Fortunately, they’re gone now. They’ve gone on to greener pastures. Or perhaps far less green, but they’re gone. Very happy they’re gone.”

There was reportedly embarrassed laughter during this segment. He also praised “TiVo” as being a cool way to watch tv, declared victory in the War on Christmas, and blamed Obama for family separations.

He’s nuts.

– More –
 

 
From The Onion:

WASHINGTON—Calling the measure “a solution that satisfies both the Democrats’ desire for representation and the and Republicans’ job-creation strategy,” Congress announced Wednesday they had reached a bipartisan compromise and will admit the District of Columbia into the Union as a slave state.

– More –
 

 
From Glenn Geist at MadMikesAmerica:

Whether or not the Love Thine Enemy trope is uniquely Christian or ever practiced, it doesn’t carry much momentum these days with the woke folk. You make someone feel uncomfortable and after 40 years of a virtuous life you still need to be ruined – et in saecula saeculorum, amen. No deposit, no return.

So, Joe Biden is wrong to work with an opponent, because opponents are the devil and immutably evil. Never mind that it produces your desired result or even accomplishes an increment of your goal. What do we want? Everything. When do we want it? Now! Never mind that people have epiphanies, conversions, moments of enlightenment or even slow revelation. They’re just the enemy. We don’t want success, we want triumph and so we fail.

No, it’s not that my halo is at the cleaners, I never had one. I don’t love my enemies, but there’s a degree of acceptance that one will always have them, because that’s how humans are. There’s a degree of acceptance that the man I see as the devil may none the less have a degree of compassion and desire to make things better that can be used to change him while moving toward the better world – and I still, even after three quarters of a century, have hope that our prodigal sons will return.

– More –
 

 
From David Robertson at The Moderate Voice:

Being that Joe Biden is the current front-runner in the Democratic presidential race, it is inevitable that his Democratic opponents will attempt to discredit him.

Apparently, at least a couple of those opponents are so scared of his presidential campaign that they have twisted his words.

In short, Biden described how he is able to maintain civility even when forced to work with the worst of politicians. He mentioned a time early in his senatorial career when he had to work with a couple of Democratic senators who were anti-black segregationists.

In a series of tweets, Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard explains why Biden’s critics are wrong.

– More –