Is Ayn Rand wrong about altruism?

found online by Raymond

 
From libertarian Michael A. LaFerrara:

Ayn Rand observed:

The basic principle of altruism is that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that service to others is the only justification of his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, virtue and value.

Do not confuse altruism with kindness, good will or respect for the rights of others. These are not primaries, but consequences, which, in fact, altruism makes impossible.

Why impossible? Think of the psychology that altruism leads to in practice. If my first duty is to live for others, then not only am I putting the one life I’ll ever have “on the back burner”; by logical extension I must conclude that it is other people’s first duty to live for me. Put more directly, each of us has no moral responsibility to support ourselves materially or spiritually, because that is other people’s responsibility. On the contrary, each of us has a moral right to other people’s time, effort, and property, because it is their responsibility to support us. In other words, altruism turns us all into predators, where any person with an unfulfilled need, unsatisfied want, or penchant for bad behavior can rightfully demand that other people fix his life. In practice, then, every person represents a threat to everyone else. What measure of kindness, good will, or respect is possible in a world where each of us is surrounded by moochers and predators? What measure of kindness, good will, or respect is possible under a moral code that encourages, as an ideal, that each of us to become a moocher or a predator?

– More –
 

Rude Female Speaks Over Coworker After He Clearly Interrupted Her

found online by Raymond

 
From The Onion:

“Do you know how humiliating it is to try and derail someone’s comment only to have them finish it in front of the entire room? You’ve been talking for three seconds, for Christ’s sake! It’s almost enough to make a guy feel like what he has to say isn’t way more important than whatever she was already saying.”

– More –
 

A Couple of Political Observations

found online by Raymond

 
From Infidel753:

The biggest news from yesterday’s Democratic primaries was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez‘s surprise victory over establishment heavyweight Joe Crowley in NY-14. A socialist who refused corporate donations and whose platform is uncompromisingly progressive, Ocasio-Cortez won by a 15-point margin despite being out-fundraised more than ten-to-one. This mostly reflects the fact that she was a much better fit for the district, which is urban and heavily Latino. Its voters have spoken, and spoken clearly.

This creates a test for the party establishment. They need to make it clear that they will support the candidate the primary voters chose. That might seem like a forgone conclusion, but remember that the DCCC, at least initially, failed to extend support to Kara Eastman, another progressive candidate who defeated the establishment’s choice in NE-02 last month. We can’t afford to have anyone playing those kinds of games when their preferred candidate doesn’t get nominated.

– More –
 

Neuromarketing for Dogs

found online by Raymond

 
From The Journal of Improbable Research:

Developing successful products aimed at dogs might not always be as straightforward as it may seem :

“Because dogs cannot speak, traditional behavioral methods may be inadequate to reveal what dogs like or dislike.”

But, according to the website of Dog Star Technologies LLC, newly developed methods involving fMRI scanning (combined with machine-learning algorithms) might be able to provide neuromarketing insights for dogs’ true preferences.

– More –
 

Fiction: The Darkest Time of Night

found online by Raymond

 

Jeremy Finley is the author of fictional work The Darkest Time of Night

From Jeremy Finley at Whatever:

It came, truly, from fake news.

When I set out to write the fictional story of the disappearance of a U.S. Senator’s grandson, and how it’s linked to unexplained vanishings across the globe, I knew I wanted the central conflict to be a clash of deep-rooted reality and the supernatural.

What I didn’t realize, though, was how a constant strain in my professional life as a reporter inadvertently slipped into the part of my brain that writes fiction.

Against all intentions, my speculative thriller was born from the very controversy over the catchphrase I have come to despise.

That realization felt like a sucker punch. The term “fake news” is the equivalent of nails on the chalkboard for the embattled journalism industry.

– More –
 

Wailing and Gnashing of Democrat Teeth

found online by Raymond

 
From David Robertson at The Moderate Voice:

The collective wailing and gnashing of teeth that you hear is coming from Democrats who want SCOTUS justices to legislate from the judicial bench.

From Politico:

The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld President Donald Trump’s travel ban, a major victory in the administration’s quest to restrict the flow of immigrants and visitors into the United States. . . The latest version of the ban levels a range of travel restrictions against five majority-Muslim countries — Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen — as well as North Korea and Venezuela. Chad, another majority-Muslim nation, was removed from the list in April.

There are at least 50 Muslim nations in the world. The travel ban affects only 5 Muslim nations. If President Trump were really anti-Muslim, then the ban would affect all Muslim nations.

“The Proclamation is expressly premised on legitimate purposes: preventing entry of nationals who cannot be adequately vetted and inducing other nations to improve their practices,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority. “The text says nothing about religion.”

– More –
 

Rodrigo Duterte: A Psychopath Who’s Right About God

found online by Raymond

 
From The Life and Times of Bruce Gerencser:

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte is a psychopath. Duterte’s approach to drug abuse and trafficking brought the praise of American sociopath Donald Trump, but most governments rightly condemned him for murdering addicts and traffickers alike. Duterte sees himself as a Filipino version of President Trump. Trump admires thugs, autocrats, and dictators, and I suspect if it weren’t for the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law, the president would likely behave as Duterte does. Imagine how Trump would resolve the immigration problem if he were unencumbered by law and public opinion.

Last Friday, Duterte riled up Catholics and Evangelicals in a televised speech shown on CBS News when he said:

Who is this stupid God? This son of a bitch is then really stupid. How can you rationalize a God? Do you believe?

[Duterte lamented that Adam and Eve’s sin in Christian theology resulted in all the faithful falling from divine grace.] You were not involved but now you’re stained with an original sins [sic] … What kind of a religion is that? That’s what I can’t accept, very stupid proposition.

Perhaps Duterte knows the Christian God better than offended Christians think he does.

– More –
 

On Publicly Shaming Trump Staffers

found online by Raymond

 
From Cato’s Julian Sanchez:
 


 

Separation Hasn’t Dented Trump’s Ratings

found online by Raymond

 
From Jonathan Bernstein:

We’re now more than a week into heavy coverage of Donald Trump’s policy of separating migrant families — but it’s already hard to argue that the backlash has dented the president’s approval ratings.

As I write this, FiveThirtyEight estimates Trump enjoys an approval rating of 42.5 percent — a bit higher than in early June, and basically the best since his brief — and historically bad — honeymoon after taking office.

– More –
 

AZ Pharmacist Refuses To Fill Prescription To Preserve Fertility

found online by Raymond

 
From Frances Langum:

If this poor woman had not received treatment to remove the CORPSE from her uterus, it could have prevented her from conceiving another pregnancy. Not very pro-family, there, wingnut.

Many on Twitter want to punish Walgreens, and while I’m all about being anti-corporation, the fact is the pharmacist was protected by Arizona state law. (Anti-woman pharmacists are “protected” in six other states.) However, he disobeyed state law by not handing her prescription to another pharmacist at the same location, and he should have been fired immediately for violating company policy by shaming her out loud in a franchised store.

This kind of baloney isn’t limited to pharmacists.

– More –