Arrogant Obama


 
Long, long ago, when my father was deeply into Christian spirituality, serving for years as a Methodist minister, he asked his bishop if it would be okay to smoke while he prayed.

The Bishop was firm. Of course not. Prayer should be thought of as a deeply religious expression of faith, a conversation with God. Smoking would be out of place.

My father was considered a bit of a gadfly in the early 1950s. As pastor to a rural conservative church, he preached a sermon against McCarthyism. The Bishop resisted the tsunami of outraged demands that this troublesome preacher be rid of.

A couple of years later, after the outcry diminished, my dad was quietly transferred to a small town. It was there that he objected to a cherished annual event, a minstrel show in blackface.

The outcry became deafening when he preached about it in a sermon entitled:

Know the truth, and the truth shall make you sick.

I think the title was taken from something written by noted liberal crusader Norman Cousins, which wouldn’t have gone over well.

A minister who wanted to smoke during prayer had to be low on the Bishop’s Maslow pyramid. Still, he said no.

Several months later, figuring the Bishop might have forgotten the conversation, my dad tried again. This time, he asked in a slightly different way:

Would it be okay if he prayed while he smoked?

The Bishop seemed surprised by the question. Of course it was okay. Prayer was the universal contact with God. It should be encouraged at any and all times.

I do try to imagine the reaction of this weary Bishop toward the end. Was he relieved when this controversy-hound of a pastor finally asked to be released from the ministry?

I think of my long departed and deeply missed father when I consider some of the rhetorical attacks on President Obama. I am intrigued by the word “arrogant.” Of course, he is not the only politician described that way.

The way, way conservative site PJMedia had it right back in 2015:

Ted Cruz is intellectually arrogant…

Welcome to the club, Ted.

Pretty much anyone has to be possessed by hubris when running for the top spot. Everyone’s one-time favorite conservative William F. Buckley once ruminated on every candidate’s run for President. He pointed out that it is faintly ridiculous to imagine anyone as President who is not President.

Ed Kilgore once recalled Buckley applying that to Nelson Rockefeller. New York’s governor ran in 1968, under a simple banner, replicated in bumper stickers and yard signs: “Rocky!” with an exclamation point. Kilgore recalls:

At the time William F. Buckley suggested that a mere “Rocky” wasn’t enough to convey the intended excitement of a Rockefeller candidacy, while “Rocky! Ahhhh!” might be a bit much.

I remember Ed Muskie running in 1972. He clearly overplayed it.

President Muskie! (Don’t you feel better already?)

Amused opponents answered it simply: No.

President Muskie was a silly thought because, well, only Presidents can be thought of that way.

In describing Ted Cruz, PJMedia did not stop with their criticism. They also included a President.

Ted Cruz is intellectually arrogant, like Ronald Reagan. The difference is that Reagan masked his arrogance with self-deprecating humor. Sen. Cruz does a Reagan impression that would do a nightclub comedian proud, but he doesn’t have Reagan’s easy and spontaneous humor.

But then they reveal their real feelings about President Reagan – and about Senator Cruz. Reagan was not self-important. He was truly great because he believed he could accomplish great things. He was arrogant in the same sense as another President:

One doesn’t think of Reagan as arrogant, but he was in fact the most arrogant leader we have had since Lincoln. He ignored the whole of the foreign policy establishment in his conviction that America stood to win the Cold War and bring down Communism.

See what they did there with Lincoln? Good old Arrogant Abe? Thinking he could wipe out slavery?

They go on to suggest that Ted’s arrogance is not what everyone thinks. It is, in fact, an ambition to do great things on behalf of a grateful humanity. Like, you know, real Presidents.

Our common use of the word “arrogant” is pretty close to the dictionary definition.

An exaggerated sense of one’s own importance or abilities.

Pretty much any candidate for the most powerful position in the world can be thought of as arrogant. That is because they are. They can actually think of themselves as President.

President Muskie! (Don’t you feel better already?)

Tee-hee.

Once in office, the importance of a President is hard to exaggerate. His ability needs no amplification. He can actually blow up the world.

Presidents are criticized. That is what a free press and, more important, a free citizenry does. But arrogance is usually not what we think about presidents we don’t like.

Quinnipiac University released a poll. Respondents were asked to describe Donald Trump. The top ten words used were as follows:

  1. idiot
  2. incompetent
  3. liar
  4. leader – – that’s not a bad one
  5. unqualified
  6. president – – that’s obvious
  7. strong – – that’s okay
  8. businessman – – yup
  9. ignorant – – oh well
  10. egotistical

Arrogant was so far down the list you’d have to drill for it. Presidents are not arrogant, but they do get criticized. It’s what we do.

Ron Paul retrospectively criticized President Reagan for spending without taxing:

I remember when Reagan asked us to raise the debt limit by 50 billion dollars in the first year he was in office.

He says “This is the last time I’m going to ask you to raise the debt limit.”

Before he was out of office he had us raise the debt limit five hundred billion dollars.

George Herbert Walker Bush was excoriated for this:

Read my lips! No new taxes!

His son, George W. Bush was criticized on the Iraq invasion by liberals, then increasingly by conservatives like Laura Ingraham:

The mishandling, I would say, the PR on the war, and the actual strategy on the ground during Bush.

And by pretty much everyone on Katrina:

George Bush doesn’t care about black people!

Franklin D. Roosevelt was a Traitor to His Class. Herbert Hoover was hated for the Great Depression and Hoovervilles – the popular name for tent cities that provided thin shelter for the suddenly homeless.

Lots of criticism. Pretty much every President.

But the moment President Obama took office, a new standard was reached. The vitiol began before he had formulated a single program, before he had performed a single action.

Death threats, threats reaching the level of concern for the Secret Service, went up by multiples. Racist signs and chants became the norm in some conservative areas.

There were, of course, adults roaming through conservative hallways. Among more responsible critics, a new word was introduced. The one meaning an exaggerated sense of one’s own importance or abilities.

Joe Scarborough reacted when President Obama talked about how to change the hearts and minds of those who denigrated those in poverty:

the arrogance

Michelle Malkin disagreed with Obama’s policy in Syria:

He is so flippant and arrogant

Tea party conservative Wayne Allyn Root got personal:

the arrogance and stupidity of Barack Hussein Obama

Nice.

One of the milder of many ham-handed parodies, put out by a now defunct internet group, survives on youtube.com

The most arrogant man in the world.

Knee slapper, there.

President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden, December 6, 2009 (From Obama Photographer Pete Souza via Instagram)
I recall a photograph of the new President in the White House. He leaned back head resting against a wall, listening thoughtfully to Vice President Joe Biden, standing in front of him. A friend showed me the photograph.

So arrogant.

Perhaps it was the slight upward positioning of the chin. How else to rest one’s head against a flat surface? Or maybe it was something more obvious.

In 2009, the new and easy use of that word, arrogant, became of some interest to me. I looked it up. Sure enough, the definition was the same:

An exaggerated sense of one’s own importance or abilities.

I think again of my father when he dwelt among the living as a cigarette smoking Man-of-God.

Can I smoke when I’m praying?
has a different ring than words with identical meaning
Can I pray when I’m smoking?

So how does that work with an exaggerated sense of one’s own importance or abilities? The word is relative, a comparison of what he think of himself with what we think of him. And all comparisons can translate to their reverse. I am taller and she is shorter. He is lighter, I am – – okay never mind.

He is arrogant translates to something a little less antiseptic.

He is less than he thinks.
or
He is inferior to his self image.
or even
He is inferior.

When I was a kid, parents occasionally noticed an attitude not fitting our position in the hierarchy of things as they ought to be. “You must think you’re grown” would be the preface to a very precise scolding.

When we heard that scolding applied to adults, we knew the words were demeaning.

Boy, know your place!

Yeah.
Arrogant.


Subscribe to the podcast via iTunes or RSS
to get episodes automatically downloaded.

 

Satan!
US Air Force is At Your Service

found online by Raymond

 
From M. Bouffant at Web of Evil:

And what is the now 70-yr. old United States Air Force up? Why, nothing worth noting.
[WARNING: Auto-play at link, because Newsweek is just that irksome.]

CHRISTIANS IN U.S. MILITARY ‘SERVE SATAN’ IF THEY TOLERATE OTHER RELIGIONS, AIR FORCE CHAPLAIN SAYS

– More –
 

Near the Right Wing
Mother of All Rallies

found online by Raymond

 
From tengrain at Mock Paper Scissors:

Meanwhile, the Juggalos (the dedicated fans of the rap-rock band Insane Clown Posse) have been planning a Washington rally of their own, too/also. They were going to protest the FBI’s designation of the Juggalos as a “loosely organized hybrid gang.” (But we cannot get people who want to blow up abortion clinics designated as domestic terrorists. Go figure.)

Anyway, the clowns went to DC! (See what I did there?)

So, the size-queen question Trump is no doubt asking as he stares at his short fingers: Who had the bigger rally?

– More –
 

New Deal with Democrats – Trump Agrees to Be Impeached

found online by Raymond

 
From The Borowitz Report:

Emerging from an Oval Office meeting with Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a beaming Trump touted the deal for his imminent removal from office.

“Chuck and Nancy and I got a deal done on impeachment,” Trump said. “It was a good deal and it was a fast deal.”

Trump said that the Democrats had convinced him that agreeing to be impeached would make him soar in popularity.

– More –
 

Conservative Mother of All Rallies – Becomes Mini-Mom

found online by Raymond

 
From Green Eagle:

The Mother of All Rallies!!! Promoted by Republicans for at least two months, this event took place in Washington D.C. today. Didn’t hear about it? Well, here’s some of the advance material:

“MOAR Mother Of All Rallies Patriot Unification Gathering-The Woodstock of American Rallies

America First patriot rally in support of American values, American culture, American traditions, and of course President Donald Trump. Our goal is to rally 1 million patriots to Washington DC to send a shock-wave message to the world that they have to go through us to take this country or change its culture.”

ONE MILLION PATRIOTS! Well, as is the inevitable outcome of right wing marches, they fell a little short of their predictions.

– More –
 

The Aerodynamics of Cheetahs’ Tails

found online by Raymond

 
From The Journal of Improbable Research:

“During high-speed pursuit of prey, the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) has been observed to swing its tail while manoeuvring (e.g. turning or braking) but the effect of these complex motions is not well understood.”

Prompting, perhaps, the question ‘what is a cheetah’s tail actually for?’

A joint US / South African study (2016) has made made steps towards answers. A set of experiments, in which tails were aerodynamically tested at various airspeeds and inclinations, in a wind tunnel, yielded results :

– More –
 

Vietnam!

found online by Raymond

 
From Max’s Dad:

Vietnam. If you werent around when that war raged on you dont know nuthin about division. Oh we have division now between dummies and non dummies and white supremacists and normal people but thats not what went on back then. Ken Burns latest is a must. His past documentaries have been fascinating and this one should be just as great. Burns may be the James Patterson or Thomas Kincaid of documentarians but you cvsannot deny his passion or attention to detail. His Baseball doc and his Jazz doc were the ones I looked forward to for years and neither disappointed. Vietnam wont either.

Vietnam was the event that “radicalized” me. Before 1968 I cared about baseball. The 64 Series with Bob Gibson, the 65 Series when my Twins lost, the 67 American League pennant race when my Twins lost on the final day. That was it. That was my list of what I cared about. Then came 1968.

1968 I was in 6th grade. I was oblivious to what was going on. I remember LBJ quitting on a Sunday night and my grandma expressing surprise. I remember Bobby Kennedy coming into a presidential race I knew nothing about. I remember MLK being assassinated and Bobby Kennedy going into a black neighborhood and telling them what had happened, an act of courage and compassion that has never been duplicated in politics. But Vietnam? That was just a war far away and one we had to win. Just like WW2, the war my father fought in. Hell yes I was for the war, why wouldnt I be? I was a kid raised on WW2 movies and TV shows.

One day Sister Julie asked us in class who supported the Vietnam War.

– More –
 

The Obituary Jerry Pournelle Deserves

found online by Raymond

 
From PZ Myers:

Pournelle died earlier this month. He (and his writing partner, Larry Niven) were big, popular names back in the 70s, and long ago I read several of his long tomes. I will say this for him: he could write an engaging potboiler, where the plot kept churning along. But in every one of his books, there was a “what the hell am I reading?” moment, followed by a period of introspection in which I had to admit to myself that if I’d been paying attention, I would have noticed that there were clear hints that this regressive conclusion was exactly what he’d been building towards all along. Then I read a few more and realized that you could predict exactly how the story would proceed from the first chapter on: the solution would always be a gushing militaristic/Libertarian fantasy. So I stopped reading him.

Except for one thing: those were also the heady days of the microcomputer revolution, and I read Byte magazine every month. Pournelle had a column in there, that was apparently popular to some people, but that I found plodding, unreadable, and useless. Well, not quite unreadable: I’d hate-read him.

– More –
 

Obamacare Repeal Rears Its Ugly Head Again

found online by Raymond

 
From Ted McLaughlin at jobsanger:

Their new plan eliminates the federal insurance subsidies, and federal medicaid payments. Instead, it sends block grants to each state for that state to come up with their own health plan. It also lowers the amount of money that the states that expanded Medicaid will get, and raises the amount the states that didn’t expand Medicaid will get.

This is an admission by Washington Republicans that they are incapable of coming up with a plan to provide Americans with health insurance, so they are punting the ball to the individual states. You can bet the Republican states will continue to deny heal insurance to many of their citizens, while Democratic states will have to drop many from their insurance programs (or increase their state budgets to cover them). The plan also gives states the right to petition to remove any of Obamacare’s requirements — like coverage for pre-existing conditions.

– More –